Good question. The logo edit design process is reserved for special occasions and hopefully will be used rarely. There are two situations that edits may arise:
1.) Minor logo tweaks such as thickness of text can be made at the discretion of the designer and submitted to me. Those changes would be considered 'Touch Ups' and wouldn't require an entire community vote because they wouldn't alter the essence of the submission. I will then post a before and after to show the community how subtle the changes are. Colors, Fonts, Design will also stay the same.
2.) The second type of change would be for the color scheme of the club. I hope that this would be used very rarely. This would be used in a similar case of the Miami Hammerheads. This occurred when we ended up with two winning logos from the same state and 1 from Kentucky that had the color purple.
There will have to be a legitimate reason to suggest a change to a designer's work. A reason that is more than, "I just don't like this color" or "I would have done it differently". This would lead to a community vote between the original and the suggested change.
The goal for both of these situations is to make slight adjustments to winning logos without altering them to the point that it diminishes the existing vote. Just because we have the Edit Phase does not mean we necessarily have to use it unless there is something big that comes up.
Of course what we want to avoid is wide-spread complaining, monday morning quarterbacking, or bashing a winning design. The tenor of this Edit Experiment should be productive and civil. With that said, I will announce this phase again when we get there (which will be soon).
Gritty wrote:
