So I'm down with whatever everyone would like. Just a few things to think about. We need the conferences to be as close to even as possible. So try breaking down 32 teams in creative ways. If the conferences aren't even then some teams will be able to schedule more non-conference games which can throw things off balance wise.
When it comes to dubbing conference champions - the only fair way to do that would probably be conference record. This because I assume people are excited to be able to schedule their own non-conference games. And overall records wouldn't be fair in that case. So the fewer teams that are in a conference, the few games that a team would play. So if we get rid of at larges (or most of them) theoretically a team could go 4-6, (4-0) in conference and then make the playoff over a school who is 7-3 (2-2) in conference.
We can really only have 8 playoff teams if we want a decent regular season. So by adding conferences we will be limiting the number of at large teams.
So some breakdowns could be (32 teams)
4 conferences of 8.
8 conferences of 4
4 conferences of 5, 2 conferences of 6
Once, again I am flexible just want us to consider the execution in addition to the creativity and the granular regional ideas. Our conferences are actually more regionally focused than the real life ones.